<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The China Syndrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newclarion.com/2009/01/the-china-syndrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/01/the-china-syndrome/</link>
	<description>Our mission is to combat the unreason and selflessness that are sweeping our culture from the nihilist left to the religious right, and to sound a new ideal of capitalism and individual rights in American politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Bourque</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/01/the-china-syndrome/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Bourque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=329#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Given the pragmatic, range-of-the-moment nature of politics today, it&#039;s not surprising to see particular policy decisions seem to be favorable every now and then.  As the old saying goes, even a stopped clock is correct twice a day.

Unfortunately, since it is purely accidental, it cannot be construed as a positive sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the pragmatic, range-of-the-moment nature of politics today, it&#8217;s not surprising to see particular policy decisions seem to be favorable every now and then.  As the old saying goes, even a stopped clock is correct twice a day.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, since it is purely accidental, it cannot be construed as a positive sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Snow</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/01/the-china-syndrome/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=329#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Militarizing NASA might possibly be part of a plan to make massive cuts to the program as part of cutting military spending . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Militarizing NASA might possibly be part of a plan to make massive cuts to the program as part of cutting military spending . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LauraB</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/01/the-china-syndrome/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>LauraB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=329#comment-297</guid>
		<description>I concur, Chuck, that this is a big &quot;JFK-like&quot; move rather than a serious attempt at security.

Too, I wouldn&#039;t trust the man - his ascension has been planned and manipulated quite well over a rather long timeframe. I highly doubt this area of endeavor wasn&#039;t a part of the plan. After all, if the sats are all downed and NASA is &quot;under control&quot;, how else to get new ones up there?

Of course, it could give a giant lift - so to speak - to the private space industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur, Chuck, that this is a big &#8220;JFK-like&#8221; move rather than a serious attempt at security.</p>
<p>Too, I wouldn&#8217;t trust the man &#8211; his ascension has been planned and manipulated quite well over a rather long timeframe. I highly doubt this area of endeavor wasn&#8217;t a part of the plan. After all, if the sats are all downed and NASA is &#8220;under control&#8221;, how else to get new ones up there?</p>
<p>Of course, it could give a giant lift &#8211; so to speak &#8211; to the private space industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/01/the-china-syndrome/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=329#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Another explanation I&#039;m thinking of is simply their desire for prestige.  They are making America like all other socialist countries in the world, but they still want to be the &quot;best&quot; socialist country, so they don&#039;t want China to have a better space program.

On Lieberman, I think he is the exception that proves the rule.  He is indeed stonger on defense than most Democrats - and as a result, he is a virtual outcast in the Democratic Party.

Another possible angle is that Obama may have a desire to be like John Kennedy, hence his support for a space program returning to the Moon.  I think Obama also wants to be like Abraham Lincoln, and so has built something like Lincoln&#039;s &quot;team of rivals&quot; in his Cabinet, after he mentioned reading the book Team of Rivals about Lincoln.

But these are just speculations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another explanation I&#8217;m thinking of is simply their desire for prestige.  They are making America like all other socialist countries in the world, but they still want to be the &#8220;best&#8221; socialist country, so they don&#8217;t want China to have a better space program.</p>
<p>On Lieberman, I think he is the exception that proves the rule.  He is indeed stonger on defense than most Democrats &#8211; and as a result, he is a virtual outcast in the Democratic Party.</p>
<p>Another possible angle is that Obama may have a desire to be like John Kennedy, hence his support for a space program returning to the Moon.  I think Obama also wants to be like Abraham Lincoln, and so has built something like Lincoln&#8217;s &#8220;team of rivals&#8221; in his Cabinet, after he mentioned reading the book Team of Rivals about Lincoln.</p>
<p>But these are just speculations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgess Laughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/01/the-china-syndrome/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgess Laughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=329#comment-293</guid>
		<description>&gt; &quot;The only explanation I can think of is that Democrats in recent years are . . . .&quot;

There is another possible explanation. The &quot;Democrats&quot; are not homogeneous. Only &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; Democrats are outright nihilists. Various other factions may seek conflicting goals. Even a single Democrat may have conflicting goals on his own individual agenda. (Quasi-Democrat Joe Lieberman is a classic example.)

This is why I think the Obama administration may in fact resemble the FDR administration in the years ahead. Based on reading I did 30 years ago, my understanding is that the FDR administration was very friendly to socialists but it was also a &quot;big tent&quot; for a zoo of conflicting ideologies. Power was the game, not any particular and uniform ideology. We will see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;The only explanation I can think of is that Democrats in recent years are . . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>There is another possible explanation. The &#8220;Democrats&#8221; are not homogeneous. Only <i>some</i> Democrats are outright nihilists. Various other factions may seek conflicting goals. Even a single Democrat may have conflicting goals on his own individual agenda. (Quasi-Democrat Joe Lieberman is a classic example.)</p>
<p>This is why I think the Obama administration may in fact resemble the FDR administration in the years ahead. Based on reading I did 30 years ago, my understanding is that the FDR administration was very friendly to socialists but it was also a &#8220;big tent&#8221; for a zoo of conflicting ideologies. Power was the game, not any particular and uniform ideology. We will see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/01/the-china-syndrome/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=329#comment-292</guid>
		<description>When I first read the headline and your opener, I was prepping for some kind of disagreement. Barack &quot;lets dismantle our nuclear arsenal&quot; Obama couldn&#039;t possibly have *anything* good to say on the topic of our defense against the looming threat of China.

But, well... hm. That really does appear to be a good decision.

Huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first read the headline and your opener, I was prepping for some kind of disagreement. Barack &#8220;lets dismantle our nuclear arsenal&#8221; Obama couldn&#8217;t possibly have *anything* good to say on the topic of our defense against the looming threat of China.</p>
<p>But, well&#8230; hm. That really does appear to be a good decision.</p>
<p>Huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
