<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Liberty, Indivisible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newclarion.com/2009/06/one-liberty-indivisible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/06/one-liberty-indivisible/</link>
	<description>Our mission is to combat the unreason and selflessness that are sweeping our culture from the nihilist left to the religious right, and to sound a new ideal of capitalism and individual rights in American politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:16:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Saint-Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/06/one-liberty-indivisible/#comment-3881</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Saint-Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1112#comment-3881</guid>
		<description>I wrote an essay about Ayn Rand and American Culture for the UK Libertarian Alliance years ago that incorporated some of David Hackett Fischer&#039;s insights. You can find it at http://books.stpeter.im/rand/america.html and you might find it of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an essay about Ayn Rand and American Culture for the UK Libertarian Alliance years ago that incorporated some of David Hackett Fischer&#8217;s insights. You can find it at <a href="http://books.stpeter.im/rand/america.html" rel="nofollow">http://books.stpeter.im/rand/america.html</a> and you might find it of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim May</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/06/one-liberty-indivisible/#comment-3817</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1112#comment-3817</guid>
		<description>Derbyshire said:

&quot;The four root stocks of Britons who formed the founding population of the U.S.A. brought four subtly different notions of liberty with them to the New World (says Fischer).&quot;

So by his letter, it&#039;s your second option -- but by his characterization of the whopping contradictions as &quot;subtly different&quot;, his intended meaning ends up as the first one.  His goal is to paper over the contradictions in conservatism (in particular, the attempt to introduce the notion of a society that is ideologically comfortable with slavery, as a type of &quot;liberty&quot;), at the price of emptying the concept &quot;liberty&quot; of any real meaning.  He does this in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Left is doing when they substitute democracy for freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derbyshire said:</p>
<p>&#8220;The four root stocks of Britons who formed the founding population of the U.S.A. brought four subtly different notions of liberty with them to the New World (says Fischer).&#8221;</p>
<p>So by his letter, it&#8217;s your second option &#8212; but by his characterization of the whopping contradictions as &#8220;subtly different&#8221;, his intended meaning ends up as the first one.  His goal is to paper over the contradictions in conservatism (in particular, the attempt to introduce the notion of a society that is ideologically comfortable with slavery, as a type of &#8220;liberty&#8221;), at the price of emptying the concept &#8220;liberty&#8221; of any real meaning.  He does this in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Left is doing when they substitute democracy for freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/06/one-liberty-indivisible/#comment-3816</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1112#comment-3816</guid>
		<description>Was Derbyshire saying there are different kinds of liberty or was he saying that different 17th and 18th century immigrant groups had different ideas about liberty?   I took it as the latter.  Did I miss something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Derbyshire saying there are different kinds of liberty or was he saying that different 17th and 18th century immigrant groups had different ideas about liberty?   I took it as the latter.  Did I miss something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2009/06/one-liberty-indivisible/#comment-3815</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1112#comment-3815</guid>
		<description>Great piece.  It&#039;s given me a lot to think about.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;By intellectually excluding the right of property from the rest of liberty, the Left could attack and destroy this most poorly-defended aspect of liberty while still passing themselves off as friends of what would henceforth be seen as political liberty. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;  

Sort of like when they say: &quot;Capitalism has nothing to do with morality&quot; huh?  Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece.  It&#8217;s given me a lot to think about.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;By intellectually excluding the right of property from the rest of liberty, the Left could attack and destroy this most poorly-defended aspect of liberty while still passing themselves off as friends of what would henceforth be seen as political liberty. &#8220;</i>  </p>
<p>Sort of like when they say: &#8220;Capitalism has nothing to do with morality&#8221; huh?  Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
