<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hijacking the Tea Party Movement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/</link>
	<description>Our mission is to combat the unreason and selflessness that are sweeping our culture from the nihilist left to the religious right, and to sound a new ideal of capitalism and individual rights in American politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim May</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7612</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If the Tea Party movement becomes associated with the Republican Party it will lose its power.&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;Moral influence dies under party action.&quot;

--Lydia Marie Child, Abolitionist, 1842

via &lt;a href=&quot;http://gusvanhorn.blogspot.com/2008/01/indeed-indeed.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gus&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If the Tea Party movement becomes associated with the Republican Party it will lose its power.</i></p>
<p>&#8220;Moral influence dies under party action.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Lydia Marie Child, Abolitionist, 1842</p>
<p>via <a href="http://gusvanhorn.blogspot.com/2008/01/indeed-indeed.html" rel="nofollow">Gus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7604</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7604</guid>
		<description>The moment I clicked over to PJTV and saw that Sarah Palin was giving a speech there, and it all began with the introducer and then her saluting Ronald Reagan&#039;s birthday... I felt a huge drop in my stomach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The moment I clicked over to PJTV and saw that Sarah Palin was giving a speech there, and it all began with the introducer and then her saluting Ronald Reagan&#8217;s birthday&#8230; I felt a huge drop in my stomach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myrhaf</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7601</link>
		<dc:creator>Myrhaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7601</guid>
		<description>Maybe the Tea Party is against both parties: http://ow.ly/1627w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the Tea Party is against both parties: <a href="http://ow.ly/1627w" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/1627w</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike N</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7598</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7598</guid>
		<description>By way of clarification I don&#039;t think Fox wants to smear the movement. They covered it because they are awed by Ms. Palin. But C-Span has avoided other much larger events in the past. Did you see the way Gibbs yesterday made fun of Palin&#039;s writing words on her hand? Perhaps she deserved a little ridicule for that. I&#039;m waiting for the 3 major networks to cover such events. Not hold breath though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By way of clarification I don&#8217;t think Fox wants to smear the movement. They covered it because they are awed by Ms. Palin. But C-Span has avoided other much larger events in the past. Did you see the way Gibbs yesterday made fun of Palin&#8217;s writing words on her hand? Perhaps she deserved a little ridicule for that. I&#8217;m waiting for the 3 major networks to cover such events. Not hold breath though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike N</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7597</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7597</guid>
		<description>Steve D: I think you&#039;re right of course. I thought the same thing regarding the media&#039;s desire to cover it. It was covered by Fox and C-span. The media want to be able to pigeonhole the movement in a way they can attack and smear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve D: I think you&#8217;re right of course. I thought the same thing regarding the media&#8217;s desire to cover it. It was covered by Fox and C-span. The media want to be able to pigeonhole the movement in a way they can attack and smear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve D</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7594</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7594</guid>
		<description>&quot;If the Tea Party movement becomes associated with the Republican Party it will lose its power&quot;

And that is precisely what they plan to accomplish; the point of the whole exercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If the Tea Party movement becomes associated with the Republican Party it will lose its power&#8221;</p>
<p>And that is precisely what they plan to accomplish; the point of the whole exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myrhaf</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7592</link>
		<dc:creator>Myrhaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7592</guid>
		<description>In polls an unnamed Republican or Democrat does better than when an actual name is used because respondents can imagine their ideal candidate running. The Tea Party is like those polls right now. As long as it has no actual leaders, everyone can ascribe his ideal meaning to the party. 

If Republicans take over the movement, then it will become the Republican Party --  the same party that gave us compassionate conservatism and fell apart in 1995 when the media called them mean. It looks like the movement is bound to disappoint, lose its lustre and fade away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In polls an unnamed Republican or Democrat does better than when an actual name is used because respondents can imagine their ideal candidate running. The Tea Party is like those polls right now. As long as it has no actual leaders, everyone can ascribe his ideal meaning to the party. </p>
<p>If Republicans take over the movement, then it will become the Republican Party &#8212;  the same party that gave us compassionate conservatism and fell apart in 1995 when the media called them mean. It looks like the movement is bound to disappoint, lose its lustre and fade away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmax</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7590</link>
		<dc:creator>madmax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7590</guid>
		<description>Tancredo gave a speech also. He&#039;s the biggest anti-immigration Repbublican politician out there yet he&#039;s pretty good with regard to the war against Islam. But he is no pro-liberty advocate. Palin and Tancredo are not the types we want speaking at these events. If the Tea Party movement becomes associated with the Republican Party it will lose its power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tancredo gave a speech also. He&#8217;s the biggest anti-immigration Repbublican politician out there yet he&#8217;s pretty good with regard to the war against Islam. But he is no pro-liberty advocate. Palin and Tancredo are not the types we want speaking at these events. If the Tea Party movement becomes associated with the Republican Party it will lose its power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fareed</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7589</link>
		<dc:creator>Fareed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7589</guid>
		<description>I was afraid this might happen. theorocrats trying to hijack the movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was afraid this might happen. theorocrats trying to hijack the movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike N</title>
		<link>http://www.newclarion.com/2010/02/hijacking-the-tea-party-movement/#comment-7588</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newclarion.com/?p=1976#comment-7588</guid>
		<description>Oops! Last Wednesday was supposed to read last Saturday the 6th. I don&#039;t know why I wrote Wednesday. I also got both emails on Sunday the 7th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! Last Wednesday was supposed to read last Saturday the 6th. I don&#8217;t know why I wrote Wednesday. I also got both emails on Sunday the 7th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
