What’s the difference in principle between physically preventing your citizens from leaving, taking hostages to keep them around, and robbing them blind to give them second thoughts?
Next thing you know we’ll be needing papers to travel.
-
Search
-
Recent Entries
- Sander Levin’s Latest Statist Efforts7.26
- Advice to Republicans6.18
- One reason Republicans Keep Losing4.8
- Sander Levin’s Republican Bashing3.14
- The Anti-Philosophical Nature of Today’s Intellectuals3.9
- It’s the Principles, Detroit12.22
- Is Debbie Wasserman Schultz Right?11.30
- Citizens Can See What the Press Can’t11.1
- The Same Old Medicine for Detroit?10.27
- Caesar’s Messiah10.13
- Visit the archives for more!
-
Fatal error: Call to undefined method WP_Error::get_item_quantity() in /home/bill_brown/newclarion.com/wp-content/themes/cutline/sidebar.php on line 22
2 responses so far ↓
1 c andrew // May 17, 2012 at 9:46 pm
Didn’t the old Soviet Union charge their “refuseniks” for their education and made them pay up before they would let them emigrate? And weren’t the particular targets Russian Jews trying to get to Israel?
Gee Chucky Schumer. Looks like you really have learned the lessons of history – you Schmuck.
2 North Bridge // May 20, 2012 at 1:07 pm
The point is not to prevent wealthy people from leaving. I don’t think the Left would care if every capitalist were gone, so long as all their wealth is expropriated on the way out.
The goal is not to keep them here. It is not to reap continued benefits from their work. It is not to ensure a growing economy. It is not even to feed the poor. The only goal here is expropriation, as an end-in-itself — to show those bastards who’s in charge.